Too many frameworks, small team
Map controls once, reuse everywhere
One customer wants SOC 2. A European prospect asks for ISO 27001. A healthcare deal brings HIPAA into the conversation. DPDP already applies to you. Then the AI feature ships and someone asks about ISO 42001.
What's actually happening
Each of these tends to arrive as its own project, with its own consultant, its own spreadsheet, and its own evidence request aimed at the same four engineers. Those engineers get asked for the same access review three times in three formats, because nobody mapped the overlap. And the overlap is large. Most of what SOC 2 asks for, ISO 27001 also asks for, in different words and a different order.
What follows is predictable. Compliance becomes the thing that interrupts real work, the evidence gets collected in a rush, quality drops, and the second audit hurts as much as the first one did.
How we help
We build one control set for your company, then map it to every framework you need. The control is written once, tested once, and evidenced once. The mapping does the translation.
Evidence collection is automated where your systems allow it, pulling from cloud configuration, ticketing, HR and endpoint tooling rather than asking a human to take screenshots. Everything lands in the platform with an owner, a frequency and a due date, so the picture is current instead of assembled in the fortnight before an audit.
Adding a framework then becomes a delta exercise. We show you what is genuinely new, which is usually a small slice, and you scope the work against that instead of starting over.
Your engineers get asked once per control. That single change does more for your compliance programme than any policy rewrite.
The work behind it
The service pages covering what we just described.
Tell us which frameworks you are juggling.
A 30 minute call is usually enough to tell you what this takes and what it costs. No pitch deck.